headermask image

financial pizza header image

Ron Paul – Is He Opposed to Low Interest Rates?

American consumers have enjoyed the lowest interest rates in decades – purchasing new homes, new cars and more.  However, in light of his intense scrutiny of the Federal Reserve, a closer look at how Ron Paul feels about interest rates is warranted.  Essentially, the Federal Reserve attempts to control the United States economy via calculated manipulation of interest rates.  It’s the Federal Reserve that’s responsible for the low interest rates we’ve enjoyed this past decade.  According to Ron Paul, the Federal Reserve should not exist.  Look at some of his views explained in this article - Abolish the Fed:

“Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce legislation to restore financial stability to America’s economy by abolishing the Federal Reserve. I also ask unanimous consent to insert the attached article by Lew Rockwell, president of the Ludwig Von Mises Institute, which explains the benefits of abolishing the Fed and restoring the gold standard, into the record.”

In a later article, Ron Paul asserts that low interest rates have made borrowing money too easy by young people who don’t borrow wisely (over-borrowing) and that the low interest rates have made life more difficult for older Americans – relying on savings accounts and certificates of deposit – wherein they earn very little money while interest rates are so low.  Consider his thoughts in the aforementioned article:

“The Fed’s inflationary policies hurt older people the most. Older people generally rely on fixed incomes from pensions and Social Security, along with their savings. Inflation destroys the buying power of their fixed incomes, while low interest rates reduce any income from savings. So while Fed policies encourage younger people to overborrow because interest rates are so low, they also punish thrifty older people who saved for retirement.”

One can only surmise from the information in these articles by Dr. Paul is that he’s opposed to the low interest rates we enjoy today.  Or, at the very least – he’s opposed to the manner in which these historically low interest rates have been achieved by the Federal Reserve.

E Lawrence Welch

5 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

  1. Your final statement is correct about Ron Paul’s position. While one could nit pick at his comment and say in that specific instance he didn’t use the key word “artificially” in front of the word low, that is indeed what he meant. Austrian economic theory holds that the market is best at setting interest rates and that to distort the interest rate will lead to over or under investment. In the case of low interest rates you get over investment, that is a higher investment in riskier projects that would not have been invested in had the market been allowed to set the interest rate. This leads to a business cycle.

    If Ron Paul were for high or low interest rates in and of themselves, he would be FOR the Fed and not against it. He just wants the rate to float on the market.

    1. Brian Moore on September 12th, 2007 at 5:08 pm
  2. It would seem to me that Ron Paul’s objection to the Federal Reserve may lie in the fact that the Constitution does not allow it. Much like everything Mr. Paul speaks against, if it’s not in the Constitution, the Federal Government can’t legally do it.

    2. Dan on September 12th, 2007 at 4:18 pm
  3. You should check out the following example:

    http://www.auburn.edu/~garriro/ivan.ppt

    Ivan is a representation of the interest rate and the supply of bricks represent the available resources in the economy.

    What happens is Ivan exaggerates the number of available bricks. Based on Ivan’s count of bricks, construction is begun on 6 houses. Eventually it becomes apparent that there are not enough bricks to complete all the projects. At that point, 2 houses have to be dismantled and bricks redirected to complete the other houses. Thus instead of building 5 houses, you try to build 6 and end up with 4.

    So if Ivan (the interest rate) lies, the incorrect number of projects will be undertaken, leading to an inevitable correction (business cycle). Ron Paul is against such lies, aka artificial interest rates.

    3. s on September 12th, 2007 at 3:11 pm
  4. This is so wrong!
    The reason that we have such low interest rates is because the fed continues to devalue the dollar. When the dollar is worth less and less, the banks must increase the incentive to borrow from them. IE:lower interest rates!

    No fed = valuable dollar = borrowing less

    4. dave on September 12th, 2007 at 12:54 pm
  5. Ron Paul is opposed to central economic planning. If the market is left free of external control/meddling, then it will naturally find the right interest rate. Simply labeling Ron Paul as being against low interest rates is false. Low interest rates are GREAT… if they are an accurate reflection of true market prices.

    5. Chris on September 12th, 2007 at 12:51 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*